Friday, March 11, 2016

THE SHINING



It was New Year’s Eve, 1989 when I first watched the Shining. I was only twelve years old, and the movie had an impact on my life. Somehow two little girls and a dad terrified me more than Jason, or Freddie, or Michael.
Having watched the movie, I didn’t expect to get much out of this book, however, I was wrong. Even though I knew what was coming (sort of) I thoroughly enjoyed it. This book was fantastic.
It didn’t scare me like the movie, but having read a few horror books now, nothing scares me like a movie. For me, reading horror novels are more about the characters and storylines, and this novel delivered on both fronts.
I truly believe Stephen King is a genius. I felt as if I was a part of Jack, Wendy, and Danny’s family. He developed the three main characters so well, and I loved how he used all three Point of Views so well. Additionally, he used the Overlook Hotel, incorporating the setting as a character very effectively. He didn’t do it by sheer description, he was able to make it active, bring it to life, and internalize the hotel’s actions through the other characters.
I absolutely loved being in their heads, and I was surprised to find out that Danny could actually read minds. That’s probably hard to portray in a movie…but, nonetheless, I was shocked that he knew what was happening to his father. Speaking of which, I loved their family dynamic, and thought King’s portrayal of Jack was excellent. The most terrifying thing for me was the domestic violence Jack had been subjected to, or inflicted, before the Overlook was a part of the story. The flashback where he broke Danny’s arm was powerful, as well as the scenes with Jack’s father. The contrast of what Jack saw when he was a kid, coupled with his connection to Danny (when he’s not drinking) made him a sympathetic character, and I loved how King developed him. I can’t say enough about how well he wrote Jack’s character and backstory.
I thought King’s pacing was almost perfect. The only part I felt Straubed down in was when Jack read all the articles and books about the Overlook’s past. It was too much for me. Aside from that, I thought the book flew by, and I never found myself bored, even having seen the movie several times.
I loved Danny’s character, however, he seemed pretty mature for a five year old. I am being nitpicky here, but I wanted to point out the observation. Danny’s special power may explain this a bit, but I found some of his internal monologue to be unrealistic (occasionally), considering his age. He used words I don’t know the meaning of to describe certain experiences at the hotel (I guess that’s not too hard to do, but he was supposed to be five years old!) Anyways, it didn’t stop me from enjoying his Point of View, but occasionally it took me out of the story (only for a millisecond).
This was the perfect “slow burn” haunting. I can see why they made a movie, the setting, isolation, pacing, and general story was done so well. Not only did it have ghosts, but if you’re not afraid of the supernatural, it also had a crazed murderer with a mallet. I think having both types of danger was another genius move. A little bit of everything. I’m afraid of ghosts, but my wife’s afraid of people, well, the Shining is the perfect combo-scare.
In closing, I loved this book. I loved the relationship between Danny and his mother, and Jack, as well as the cook’s (I listened to the book on Audible, so I won’t attempt to spell Halaran…well I just did…and I’m certain it’s wrong). The scene where Danny bonds with the cook was a blast.
Finally, I liked King’s shout out to Shirley Jackson (through Jack) in an internal monologue mid-way through the book.

4 comments:

  1. Great observations on the Shining! I was more familiar with the movie recently myself (I read the book a long time ago, but it's the imagery from the movie that's stuck with me). I have to say the book does a much better job of telling the story that King intended than the movie does. In fact, after reading the book and watching the movie in the past week, it now seems (to me, at least), the absolute worst movie adaptations I can think of. Yet it somehow makes a decent movie!

    Danny did seem a little more mature than most five-year-olds, but I wanted to suspend disbelief because of his Shining. I want to believe that his gift makes him seem more mature.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Chad, I agree, as far off as the adaptation was, it was still a great movie. And the casting of Wendy...man, what a difference in character too.

      Delete
  2. Mark, you bring up some very good points. In fact, as I read the novel I kept thinking to myself, I have to bring that up. In thinking back, I don't recall if I mentioned the items in my post.

    I 100% agree with you that King made Danny much more intelligent than his 5-years. There were plenty of times that I thought to myself that no five year old would say that...

    The other thing you listed was the internal thoughts of Danny. You already know that I listen and read the books so that I can get through the novel in a times manner. The narrator did a great job distinguishing between Danny and Tony. I realize that the italics is the internal thoughts, however I don't know that I would have put the two together if I were reading without the audiobook.

    In closing, I actually read the book before watching the movie. When I was younger, the poster scared me enough that I never viewed The Shining. The book was so well written by King, that I had to watch it. My son told me that King was very disappointed in the movie and regretted selling the rights to the producer. In my opinion, the movie was so terrible that even an hour in, I contemplated turning it off. I did power through it, but I'll say that I'm glad I read the book first.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have not watched The Shining in a long time but I have watched it more than once. This is a first time I have ever read the book. I have to say I think the book was way better. I don't remember the scene between Danny and the man dressed as a dog in the movie, and that scene in the book for me was scary as hell, something about people wearing masks and acting out character just totally freaks me out. The movie still manages to terrify me, although the book does a much better job. I agree with you on the unrealistic protayal of a five year old. Great write up Mark, the backstory and being their heads is what really made the story for me and that was absent from the movie. But Stephen King had such a layered and rich story that they still managed to make a movie out of it leaving out all the good parts.

    ReplyDelete